hidden
sitebar

Archive for the ‘Discussion’ Category

Mayor – who cares?

Even if – or maybe even because – Facebook just fueled the check-in hype with Places, the veterans in the market, Foursquare and Gowalla, are being as boring as rocks. At least Foursquare wants to release a new feature, though. Read the rest of this entry »

Fight for the Middle Class (II): Website in a Package from Telegate

Just how important the personal website is in the times of social media definitely brings up some opposing ideas, especially when discussing the involvement of a firm in the Web 2.0 world. When it comes to small- to medium-sized industries, Telegate (11880, Klicktel) has found an unusual answer – the Munich-based firm is helping online companies to build their own web presence. Read the rest of this entry »

Fight for the Middle Class (I): Google On Call?

Technically, Google seems to have finally gotten it: whoever wants to win over the middle-class has to work for it. Somehow, the idea has caught on that the world doesn’t belong to Google, as a new “service-offensive” shows. Read the rest of this entry »

Google and the Social Problem: Reviews instead of a Wave

Google is still treading on eggshells when it comes to its social media route. Wave has finally been put to rest and Places is getting an extra treat for business owners: they can now directly respond to user ratings. Read the rest of this entry »

UPromote.it vs. Shopkick: Start-Ups on the Hunt for SME/CRM Solutions

What if SMEs and SOHOs suddenly had a new means of direct marketing literally in the palm of their hands? Thanks to Mark McCormack’s new website, uPromote.it, this is possible.

The principle behind the concept is that promotions can be created with just a few steps using a mobile device, proceeding to be quickly distributed to a broad range of points including Facebook, Twitter, SMS, and Email.

Though the marketing is primarily focused on current customers, the contacts of those customers are also easily accessed through social networking. In other words, there is an unlimited amount of potential customers to be accessed.

Read the rest of this entry »

Now Even More Social: Check-Ins by SCVNGR

Social Check-In AppCheck-ins have actually always been social: whether through Foursquare, Gowalla, and whatever other programs that are out there, checking-in and letting your friends know where you are and what you’re up to is just about the most “social” feature available by location-based sevices. So what does it mean when competitor SCVNGR is talking about “social check-ins?” Read the rest of this entry »

Brightkite Attracts with Badges and Rewards

Checking in can get old after a while. Checking in, collecting points, checking in, collecting points…Brightkite has had a new idea – or at least it should come across that way. The Californians have enhanced their badges with new levels. Read the rest of this entry »

Is Geofencing the Future of Location-Based Apps?

First of all, what is geofencing? Basically, it’s a series of virtual perimeters for real-world geographic areas. In other words, geofencing is the process of creating virtual borders for the purpose, of say, being alerted of events in your current area, or perhaps of friends who are around the corner. So what does this mean for location-based technologies? Read the rest of this entry »

Social Networks: Less Active Users Than Expected

The latest W3B study from the market development and advising company Fittkau & Maß Consulting revealed some surprising information: 62% of the current internet users on social networks visit the sites on a regular basis (at least once a week) but only 35%, and from this group merely 40% are really active users. The majority is rather passive, in other words, watches from the sidelines. Read the rest of this entry »

RottenNeighbor.com – the negative side of Web2.0?

Internet-user evaluations of undertakings or service providers, such as those possible on dialo.de, kennstdueinen.de [en=doyouknowone] or Qype.com are one thing, but portals that encourage actual “cybermobbing” are something altogether different.

RottenNeighbor.comRottenNeighbor.com is such a site. Launched just over a year ago in the USA by Brant Walker, it sees itself as the world’s first search engine that allows users to judge their neighbors and rate them – positively or negatively. Using this site, visitors could inform themselves about the potential new neighborhood before buying a property, or to warn other users about bad neighbors.

In reality, most users actually use the site to take revenge on hated people – to discriminate, denounce or slander – whether neighbor, colleague, ex-partner or rival. In this way this online-pillory affects both private citizens as well as business people.  In so doing, RottenNeighbor.com uses cartographic material provided by Google Maps.  After entering an address in the search field, the location is question appears in Map View. Addresses/locations of already-rated people appear as house icons– red for bad neighbor, green for good neighbor. A click on the icon opens a window usually revealing a tasteless entry from an unidentifiable user dishing the inhabitant(s) of the marked house.

Apart from the fact that by identifying the exact location, the name of the occupant can be discovered, few users are deterred from fully naming the ‘guilty’ party, while the user remains anonymous. Photos and videos of the denounced person can also be uploaded.  None of this is edited by the site’s administrators, leaving unvetted content on the web.

As of a couple of months, RottenNeighbor.com has been enjoying steadily growing interest also in Germany.  The access numbers have grown so much in recent weeks that the server experienced overloads at the beginning of September, and the German portal was inaccessible for several days. As with the growing hits, so did the number of comments delivered by German citizens.  Since then, there is hardly a German town on the virtual map, where one can not find some green houses and many red ones with predominantly insulting remarks.

Whomever is defamed on this website – and this can affect anyone – can basically not defend him or herself. Even when one chose to sue for defamation of character or libel, and claim damages or compensation, it is extremely difficult to discover the person who posted the defamation. Firstly, the accusations are delivered anonymously, and secondly, the portal’s administrators are located in the USA, where other data protection guidelines and views on freedom of expression take effect. One can indeed have a rating removed, but this takes time and doesn’t protect against new insults.

While other ratings platforms concentrate on objective criticism on offers, products, services or activities connected to the function of the person being rated, RottenNeighbor.com concentrates above all on private persons.  This leads to the public airing of feuds and revenge-lust.  The use of such a platform is even more questionable, as the accuracy of the comments is almost impossible to ascertain. The personal damage that can be inflicted by the platform is therefore immeasurably large.

Online-pillory or valuable information platform – what do you think of RottenNeighbor.com?

Facebook
Follow us
User